Modernity vs. Insurgency. The Colombian guerrilla case
Abstract
This article discusses the concepts of modernity and insurgency in order to develop the question of the causal relationship between a degree of modernity and the possibility of the emergence of the insurgency among the Colombian population. In his regard is to highlight how the construction of modernity emerges as a stage to shield the possibility of social marginalization , and this proposal is projected in a research framework to correlate with specific variables to conduct the empirical correlations established field of a hypothetical deductive mode. Thus a process of radical modernity and modernization is seen as the way to build peace in Colombia , to the extent that it contributes to justice , equity and forgiveness. A modernity from the construction of the subject , from the material conditions and especially since the construction of the national political debate , not in sight without structural changes in institutions .
Downloads
Disciplines:
Bioethics, Social Sciences, Medical SciencesLanguages:
enReferences
• Berman, M. (1988). All that is solid melt into air, the experience of modernity. New York:
• Viking Penguin, New York.
• Berman, M. (1988). El Debate modernidad-postmodernidad. Buenos Aires: Punto sur.
• Bernstein, J. (Ed.) (1985). Habermas and modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Braun, H. (1994). Our Guerrillas,Our Sidewalks: A journey Into The Violence of Colombia. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.
• Borradori, G. (2003). La filosofía en una época de terror. Diálogos con Jürgen Habermas y Jacques
• Derrida. Madrid: Taurus.
• Bourdieu, P. (1997): Las reglas del Artes. Madrid: Taurus.
• Bourdieu, P. (1995). Respuestas. Por una antropología reflexiva. México: Grijalbo.
• Dahrendorf, R. (2004). “Las potencias del futuro”. En: País Global, 27 de dic., Buenos Aires.
• Drew, C. (1988). Insurgency and counter in surgency. Alabama: Airpower Research Institute.
• Habermas, J. (1985): Ética del discurso. Barcelona: Península.
• Habermas, J. (1986). Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews. New Yorg: Verso.
• Habermas, J. (1987a). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Habermas, J. (1987b). Escrito sobre moralidad y eticidad. Barcelona: Uiversidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Paidós.
• Habermas, J. (1989). El discurso filosófico de la modernidad. Madrid: Taurus.
• Habermas, J. (1996). Debate sobre liberalismo político. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Paidós.
• Habermas, J. (1989). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Tauros.
• Habermas, J. (2000). La Constelación Post-nacional. Barcelona: Paidós.
• McCarthy, T. (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Ocampo, J. A. (cd,1987). Historia económica de Colombia. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo.
• O’Neill, J. (1985). Decolonization and the Ideal Speech Community: Some Issues in the Theory and Practice of Communicative Competence. En J. Forester (Ed.), Critical Theory and Public Life (pp. 57-76). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Ortiz, R. (2005). La estrategia de seguridad de la administración Uribe: un balance de oportunidades y
• Retos.. Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.
• Sobrevilla, D. (1991). El derecho, la política y la ética. México: Universidad Autónoma de México.
• Specter, M. (2004). Perpetual War or Perpetual Peace? Schmitt, Habermas and Theories of American
• Empire. Duke: Duke University.
• Trey, G. (1998). Solidarity and difference: the politics of enlightenment in the aftermath of modernity. Albany. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Tulchin, J.(2003). Seguridad en las Américas después del 11 de septiembre: un rompecabezas no resuelto. En F. Rojas Aravena (Ed.), La seguridad en América Latina post 11 de septiembre. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad. pp 102-115.
• Zalamea, F. (2000). Ariel y Arisbe. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
