Consentimiento informado em pesquisa clínica: revisão da literatura 2012-2022
Resumo
O consentimento informado envolve uma obrigação legal do profissional de saúde anterior ao ato médico, especialmente diante de procedimentos diagnósticos, terapêuticos, preventivos ou cirúrgicos. Na investigação clínica, o consentimento informado envolve um processo em que uma pessoa decide voluntariamente participar na investigação. O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar uma
revisão de literatura em relação aos artigos primários sobre consentimento informado em pesquisa clínica publicados entre 2012 e 2022. Foi realizada uma revisão de artigos primários, cujo objeto de estudo foi o consentimento informado em pesquisa clínica. Bases de dados consultadas: Pubmed, Embase, Proquest, Google/Google Scholar e Web of science, além de periódicos especializados. As buscas foram realizadas entre dezembro de 2022 e janeiro de 2023. O resultado do processo de busca foram 705 artigos e 55 atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. A maioria foram estudos observacionais e qualitativos (29,1%, respectivamente). O principal núcleo temático foi a compreensão. 94,5% dos artigos correspondiam ao idioma inglês (n=52), enquanto 5,5% correspondiam ao espanhol (n=3). Concluindo, a compreensão da informação e o binómio informação-comunicação constituem componentes essenciais no contexto da investigação clínica. Como alternativa ou complemento ao habitual consentimento informado, consolidam-se recursos multimédia como o vídeo.
Downloads
Referências
Cadenas D. El consentimiento informado y la responsabilidad médica. Madrid (España): Boletín Oficial del Estado; 2018. 656 p.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Comités de Ética de Investigación. Conceptos básicos para el desarrollo de capacidades [Internet]. OMS; 2009 [citado 17 de octubre de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.uchile.cl/documentos/comites-de-etica-de-investigacion-conceptos-basicos-para-el-desarrollo-de-capacidades_76961_4_0613.pdf
Kadam RA. Informed consent process: a step further towards making it meaningful. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2017;8:107-12.
Mandava A, Pace C, Campbell B, Emanuel E, Grady C. The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(6):356-65. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100178
Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358:1772-7.
Borda M. El proceso de investigación. Visión general de su desarrollo. Quinta reimpresión. Barranquilla (Colombia): Editorial Universidad del Norte; 2016. 269 p.
Raj M, Choi SW, Platt J. A qualitative exploration of the informed consent process in hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical research and opportunities for improvement. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2017;52(2):292-298. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.252
Vreeman R, Kamaara E, Kamanda A, Ayuku D, Nyandiko W, Atwoli L, et al. A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2012 may. 20;13(23):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-23
Kraft SA, Constantine M, Magnus D, Porter KM, Lee SS, Green M, et al. A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent. Clin Trials. 2017;14(1):94-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774516669352
Cervo S, Rovina J, Talamini R, Perin T, Canzonieri V, De Paoli P, et al. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-30
O’ Sullivan L, Feeney L, Crowley RK, Sukumar P, McAuliffe E, Doran P. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff. Trials. 2021;22(1):544. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1
Miller VA, Werner-Lin A, Walser SA, Biswas S, Bernhardt BA. An observational study of children’s involvement in informed consent for exome sequencing research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017;12(1):6-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616674096
Fanaroff AC, Li S, Webb LE, Miller V, Navar AM, Peterson ED, et al. An observational study of the association of video- versus text-based informed consent with multicenter trial enrollment: Lessons from the PALM Study (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(4):e004675. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004675
Kiguba R, Kutyabami P, Kiwuwa S, Katabira E, Sewankambo NK. Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;13(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-21
Boyd DH, Zhang Y, Smith L, Adam L, Foster Page L, Thomson WM. Caregivers’ Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Control Trial. J Bioeth Inq. 2021;18(1):141-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10085-w
Choi IS, Choi EY, Lee IH. Challenges in informed consent decision-making in Korean clinical research: A participant perspective. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216889
De Sutter E, Coopmans B, Vanendert F, Dooms M, Allegaert K, Borry P, et al. Clinical research in neonates: Redesigning the informed consent process in the digital era. Front Pediatr. 2021 sept. 1;9:724431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431
Baggio S, Gétaz L, Giraudier L, Tirode L, Urrutxi M, Carboni S, et al. Comparison of audiovisual and paper-based materials for 1-time informed consent for research in prison: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2235888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35888
Alexa-Stratulat T, Neagu M, Neagu AI, Alexa ID, Ioan BG. Consent for participating in clinical trials - Is it really informed? Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(3):299-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12199
Roberts L, Kim JP. Does informed consent given by healthy individuals when enrolling in clinical research feel less voluntary than for ill individuals? J Psychiatr Res. 2018;103:33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.04.018
Smith OM, McDonald E, Zytaruk N, Foster D, Matte A, Clarke F, et al. Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29(6):300-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2013.04.006
Berrios C, James CA, Raraigh K, Bollinger J, Murray B, Tichnell C, et al. Enrolling genomics research participants through a clinical setting: the impact of existing clinical relationships on informed consent and expectations for return of research results. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(1):263-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2
Giménez N, Pedrazas D, Redondo S, Quintana S. Ensayos clínicos y consentimiento informado: visión de investigadores, pacientes y médicos de familia. Aten Primaria. 2016;48(8):518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.10.008
Marrero-Álvarez P, Ruiz-Ramos J, Megías-Vericat JE, Tordera-Baviera M, Poveda-Andrés JL. Evaluación de la hoja de información al paciente y del consentimiento informado en ensayos clínicos. Rev Calid Asist. 2013;28(3):139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cali.2012.08.003
Casanova-Olortegui I. Evaluación del nivel de conocimiento del consentimiento informado en investigadores de ensayos clínicos. Cienc Salud. 2020;12(1):1-9.
Linder M, Lev L, Kurs R, Melamed Y. Evaluation of the capacity of inpatients with chronic schizophrenia to provide informed consent for participation in clinical trials: Use of the Hebrew version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR). IMAJ. 2012 ago.;14(8):470-4.
Corneli A, Namey E, Mueller MP, Tharaldson J, Sortijas S, Grey T, et al. Evidence-Based Strategies for Shortening Informed Consent Forms in Clinical Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017;12(1):14-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616682550
Jacquier E, Laurent-Puig P, Badoual C, Burgun A, Mamzer M. Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: The case in CARPEM consortium. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00592-9
Kim H, Bell E, Kim J, Sitapati A, Ramsdell J, Farcas C, et al. iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and biosample use for research. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2016;24(2):380-387. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw115
Paris A, Deygas B, Cornu C, Thalamas C, Maison P, Duale C, et al. Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients’ understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(5):1010-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12716
Koonrungsesomboon N, Teekachunhatean S, Hanprasertpong N, Laothavorn J. Improved participants’understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: A randomizedcontrolled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(4):413-21. https://doi.org/:10.1007/s00228-015-2000-2
Koonrungsesomboon N, Traivaree C, Chamnanvanakij S, Rungtragoolchai P, Thanapat Y, Karbwang J. Improved pregnant women’s understanding of research information by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomised controlled study nested in neonatal research. ADC Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-312615
Palmeirim M, Ross A, Obrist B, Mohammed UA, Ame S, Ali S, et al. Informed consent procedure in a double blind randomized anthelminthic trial on Pemba Island, Tanzania: do pamphlet and information session increase caregivers’ knowledge. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0441-3
van Wijk RPJ, van Dijck JT, Timmers M, van Veen E, Citerio G, Lingsma H, et al. Informed consent procedures in patients with an acute inability to provide informed consent: Policy and practice in the CENTER-TBI. J Crit Care.2020;59:6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.004
Sanchini V, Reni M, Calori G, Riva E, Reichlin M. Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient’s informed consent comprehension. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(4):269-75. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101115
Schumacher A, Sikov WM, Quesenberry MI, Safran H, Khurshid H, Mitchell KM. Informed consent in oncology clinical trials: A Brown University Oncology Research Group prospective cross-sectional pilot study. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172957
Lorell BH, Mikita JS, Anderson A, Hallinan ZP, Forrest A. Informed consent in clinical research: Consensus recommendations for reform identified by an expert interview panel. Clin Trials. 2015;12(6):692-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774515594362
Bishop FL, Greville-Harris M, Bostock J, Din A, Graham CA, Lewith G, et al. Informing adults with back pain about placebo effects: Randomized controlled evaluation of a new website with potential to improve informed consent in clinical research. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e9955. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9955
Mansour H, Zaki N, Abdelhai R, Sabry N, Silverman H, El-Kamary SS. Investigating the informed consent process,therapeutic misconception and motivations of Egyptian research participants: a qualitative pilot study. East Mediterr Health. 2015;21(3):155-63. https://doi.org/10.26719/2015.21.3.155
Hu Z, Ouyang C, Hahne J, Khoshnood K, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of research participants in China toward electronic informed consent in clinical trials: A cross sectional study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022;17(3):362-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221075884
Muzanyi G, Sekitoleko I, Johnson JL, Lunkuse J, Nalugwa G, Nassali J, et al. Level of education and preferred language of informed consent for clinical research in a multi-lingual community. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(2):955-959. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i2.51
Cleret de Langavant L, Sudraud S, Verny C, Krystkowiak P, Simonin C, Damier P, et al. Longitudinal study of informed consent in innovative therapy research: experience and provisional recommendations from a multicenter trial of intracerebral grafting. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0128209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128209
Díaz-Pérez A, Navarro-Quiroz E, Aparicio-Marenco DE. Moral structuring of children during the process of obtaining informed consent in clinical and research settings. BMC Med Ethics. 2020 nov. 25;21(1):122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00540-z
Kaye DK. Motivation to participate and experiences of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in emergency obstetric care in Uganda. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 jul. 28;22(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00672-w
Bossert S, Kahrass H, Heinemeyer U, Prokein J, Strech D. Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 dic. 20;18(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7
Solomon ED, Mozersky J, Baldwin K, Wroblewski MP, Parsons MV, Goodman M, et al. Perceived barriers to assessing understanding and appreciation of informed consent in clinical trials: A mixed-method study. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021;5(1):e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.807
Scott M, Watermeyer J, Nolle S, Penn C. Perceived challenges in the informed consent process: Mismatches between enrollers and researchers at a South African clinical research site. Dev World Bioeth. 2019;19(4):206-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12218
De Sutter E, Borry P, Geerts D, Huys I. Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 jul. 31;22(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00675-7
Killawi A, Khidir A, Elnashar M, Abdelrahim H, Hammoud M, Elliott H, et al. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 feb. 4;15(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-9
Taylor HA, Washington D, Wang NY, Patel HD, Ford DE, Kass NE, et al. Randomized comparison of two interventions to enhance understanding during the informed consent process for research. Clin Trials. 2021;18(4):466-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745211009529
O’Sullivan L, Sukumar P, Crowley R, McAuliffe E, Doran P. Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e037994. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994
Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES, Balgobin S, Ballard A, Weidner AC. Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study. Clin Trials. 2019;16(5):481-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774519865541
Tindana P, Bull S, Amenga-Etego L, de Vries J, Aborigo R, Koram K, et al. Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. BMC Med Ethics. 2012 jul.;13(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-15
Bobb MR, Van Heukelom PG, Faine BA, Ahmed A, Messerly JT, Bell G, et al. Telemedicine Provides Noninferior Research Informed Consent for Remote Study Enrollment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(7):759-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12966
Mahafzah R, Alzoubi KH, Khabour OF. The Attitudes of Relatives of ICU Patients toward Informed Consent for Clinical Research. Crit Care Res Pr. 2020 oct. 9;2020:2760168. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.1155/2020/2760168
Tori K, Kalligeros M, Shehadeh F, Khader R, Nanda A, van Aalst R, et al. The process of obtaining informed consent to research in long term care facilities (LTCFs): An observational clinical study. Med Baltim. 2020;99(21):e20225. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020225
Offerman SR, Nishijima DK, Ballard DW, Chetipally UK, Vinson DR, Holmes JF. The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(4):403-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12117
De Sutter E, Verreydt S, Yskout K, Geerts D, Borry P, Outtier A, et al. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02039-6
Silva JCRAD, Capucho HC. Virtual consent and the use of electronic informed consent form in clinical research in Brazil. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2021;67(11):1570-1574. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20210621
Ssali A, Poland F, Seeley J. Volunteer experiences and perceptions of the informed consent process: Lessons from two HIV clinical trials in Uganda. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 dic. 3;16(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0073-1
Karbwang J, Koonrungsesomboon N, Torres CE, Jimenez EB, Kaur G, Mathur R, et al. What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0318-x
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. 2013 [citado 23 de enero de 2023]. Disponible en https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1760318
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Meeting New Challenges in Informed Consent in Clinical Resarch [Internet]. OHRP; 2018 [citado 23 de enero de 2023]. Disponible en https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/meeting-new-challenges.pdf
Lema V, Mbondo M, Mberu E. Informed consent for clinical trials: A review. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(3):133-42. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v86i3.54968
University of California Riverside. Informed Consent Guide [Internet]. University of California; 2019 [citado 12 de febrero de 2025]. Disponible en https://research.ucr.edu/sites/default/files/2020-08/ori-Informed_Consent_Guide.pdf
Clark PA. Bioethics: Medical, ethical and legal perspectives. Croatia: InTech; 2016. 238 p.
Nguyen Y, Dang T, Lam N, Le P, Nguyen P, Bull S, et al. Fragmented understanding: exploring the practice and meaning of informed consent in clinical trials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. BMC Med Ethics. 2023 ene. 16;24(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00884-2
| Métricas do artigo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas abstratas | |
| Visualizações da cozinha | |
| Visualizações de PDF | |
| Visualizações em HTML | |
| Outras visualizações | |
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
