Teorías de la conspiración en torno al desarrollo del lenguaje
Un caso de interacciones en línea
Abstract
Con el auge de la digitalización sobre los modos tradicionales de comunicación en la rápida difusión de información, proliferan afirmaciones no fundamentadas, particularmente en el ámbito del aprendizaje en línea. Tales afirmaciones, frecuentemente equiparadas con fabricaciones, ejercen una notable influencia en la configuración del discurso público. En este contexto, el artículo busca examinar el impacto de las teorías de la conspiración en el desarrollo del lenguaje dentro de entornos de aprendizaje en línea. Esta investigación cualitativa empleó entrevistas a grupos focales como principal método de recolección de datos, seleccionadas por su capacidad para obtener perspectivas profundas sobre las experiencias vividas de los participantes. La muestra de investigación estuvo compuesta por seis docentes seleccionados por conveniencia, responsables de impartir módulos relacionados con el lenguaje en distintos niveles de formación estudiantil. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante la aplicación de preguntas abiertas, lo que facilitó la exploración de las percepciones de los docentes respecto a la intersección entre el aprendizaje en línea y el desarrollo del lenguaje. Los hallazgos del estudio destacan dos preocupaciones principales: 1) la necesidad de invertir en iniciativas de verificación de información para contrarrestar la circulación de datos no verificados, y 2) el impacto perjudicial de la desinformación en las actitudes públicas, que a su vez debilita el desarrollo del lenguaje y altera las prácticas educativas establecidas. A la luz de estos resultados, el estudio recomienda la promoción sistemática de la alfabetización mediática digital como estrategia pedagógica para fortalecer las competencias lingüísticas de los estudiantes, al tiempo que se mitiga la influencia de la desinformación en los entornos en línea. En última instancia, estas medidas convergen en la formación de estudiantes como pensadores críticos capaces de desenvolverse en las complejidades de la comunicación digital.
Downloads
References
Adler, J. M., and Landa, L. (2020). Conspiracy Theories in the Age of the Internet: Implications for Learning and Teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 277-301.
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., and Timmermann, C. (2023). Reframing data ethics in research methods education: a pathway to critical data literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00380-y
Barzilai, S., and Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the "post-truth" condition: Four lenses on "post-truth" problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
Berman, D. S., and Stoddard, J. D. (2021). "It's a growing and serious problem": Teaching 9/11 to combat misinformation and conspiracy theories. The Social Studies, 112(6), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00377 996.2021.1929054
Blommaert, J., and Verschueren, J. (2022). The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 2(3), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.13blo
Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Moore, G., Tuncalp, O., and Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Formulating questions to address the acceptability and feasibility of complex interventions in qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Global Health, 4, e001107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Zhilin, O., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T., and Ruths, D. (2021). Infodemic pathways: Evaluating the role that traditional and social media play in cross-national information transfer. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpos.2021.648646
Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349216
Cíbik, M., and Hardoš, P. (2022). Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119899232
Clark, C. H. (2018). The impact of student political identity over the course of an online controversial issue discussion. Democracy and Education, 26(2), 1 https://democracye ducationjournal.org/home/vol26/iss2/1
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., and Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12(5), e0175799. https:// doi.org/10. 1371/ journal. pone.0175799
Craft, S., Ashley, S., and Maksl, A. (2017). News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public, 2(4), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317725539
Darabi, A., Arrington, T. L., and Sayilir, E. (2018). Learning from failure: A meta-analysis of the empirical studies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9579-9
Dewaele, J. M., and MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety.
M. Sato, and S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 263-286). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351190558-12
DeWitt, D., Atkinson, M. and Wegner, D. (2018). How conspiracy theories spread. In: Uscinski JE (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0021
Douglas, K. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982068
Douglas, K.M., Uscinski, J.E., and Sutton, R.M. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40(S1): 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., and Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(1), 3-35 .https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Dyrendal, A., and Jolley, D. (2020). Conspiracy theories in the classroom: Problems and potential solutions. Religion, 11(10), 494. https://doi. org/ 10. 3390/ rel11100494
Flemming, K., and Noyes, J. (2021). Qualitative evidence synthesis: Where are we at? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276
Goreis, A., and Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 725-756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Gusenbauer M., and Haddaway NR (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods 11(2): 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Graeupner, D., and Coman, A. (2017). The dark side of meaning-making: How social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003
Kubota, R., Aoyama, R., Kajigaya, T., and Deschambault, R. (2022). Illuminating language users in the discourse of linguistic diversity: Toward justice-informed language education. Educational Linguistics, 1, 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2022-0011
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., and Douglas, K. M. (2017). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.8
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., and Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the "Post-Truth" Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., and Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
Mahl D, Zeng J and Schafer MS (2021) From "nasa lies" to "reptilian eyes": mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Social Media + Society 7(2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482
Mancosu, M. and Vegetti, F. (2020) "Is it the message or the messenger?": conspiracy endorsement and media sources. Social Science Computer Review 39(6): 1203-1217.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320965107
Mercier, H., and Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674977860
Oliver, J. E., and Wood, T. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Pearson, C. A., and Rae, A. M. (2017). Beliefs in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizophyte. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 279-284.
Pennycook, G., and Rand, D. G. (2018). The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Stories Increases Perceived Accuracy of Stories Without Warnings. Management Science, 67(11), 4944-4957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication 35(3): 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066
Sato, M., and Loewen, S. (2022). The research-practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and future. Modern Language Journal, 106, 509-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., and Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33(47), 74.
Van Dijck, J., Winkel, T. and de Schafer, M.T. (2021) Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045662
Van Hell, J. G. (2023). The neurocognitive underpinnings of second language processing: Knowledge gains from the past and future outlook. Language Learning, 73(Suppl. 2), 95-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12601
van Prooijen, J. W., and Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Vaportzis, E., Giatsi Clausen, M., and Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults' perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., and Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Ward, J. S., and Barker, A. (2013). Undefined by data: A survey of big data definitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.5821.
Wood, M. J., and Douglas, K. M. (2013). "What about Building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.3999 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
Copyright (c) 2026 Academia y Virtualidad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
