Conspiracy Theories Towards Language Development
A Case of Online Engagements
Resumen
With the ascendancy of digitalization over traditional modes of communication in the rapid dissemination of information, a proliferation of unsubstantiated claims has emerged, particularly within the domain of online learning. Such claims, frequently equated with fabrications, exert a notable influence on the shaping of public discourse. In this context, the present study seeks to examine the impact of conspiracy theories on language development within online learning environments. This qualitative investigation employed focus group interviews as the primary data collection method, chosen for their capacity to elicit in-depth insights into participants’ lived experiences. The research sample comprised six conveniently selected teachers responsible for delivering language-related modules across varying levels of student registration. Data were obtained through the administration of open-ended questions, which facilitated the exploration of teachers’ perceptions regarding the intersection of online learning and language development. The findings of the study underscore two principal concerns: (i) the necessity of investing in fact-checking initiatives to counteract the circulation of unverified information, and (ii) the detrimental impact of misinformation on public attitudes, which, in turn, undermines language development and disrupts established educational practices. In light of these outcomes, the study recommends the systematic promotion of digital media literacy as a pedagogical strategy to strengthen learners’ linguistic competencies while simultaneously mitigating the influence of misinformation in online spaces. Ultimately, these measures converge toward the cultivation of learners as critical thinkers capable of navigating the complexities of digital communication.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Adler, J. M., and Landa, L. (2020). Conspiracy Theories in the Age of the Internet: Implications for Learning and Teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 277-301.
Atenas, J., Havemann, L., and Timmermann, C. (2023). Reframing data ethics in research methods education: a pathway to critical data literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00380-y
Barzilai, S., and Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the "post-truth" condition: Four lenses on "post-truth" problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
Berman, D. S., and Stoddard, J. D. (2021). "It's a growing and serious problem": Teaching 9/11 to combat misinformation and conspiracy theories. The Social Studies, 112(6), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00377 996.2021.1929054
Blommaert, J., and Verschueren, J. (2022). The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 2(3), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.13blo
Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Moore, G., Tuncalp, O., and Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Formulating questions to address the acceptability and feasibility of complex interventions in qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Global Health, 4, e001107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Zhilin, O., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T., and Ruths, D. (2021). Infodemic pathways: Evaluating the role that traditional and social media play in cross-national information transfer. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpos.2021.648646
Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349216
Cíbik, M., and Hardoš, P. (2022). Conspiracy theories and reasonable pluralism. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(3), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119899232
Clark, C. H. (2018). The impact of student political identity over the course of an online controversial issue discussion. Democracy and Education, 26(2), 1 https://democracye ducationjournal.org/home/vol26/iss2/1
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., and Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12(5), e0175799. https:// doi.org/10. 1371/ journal. pone.0175799
Craft, S., Ashley, S., and Maksl, A. (2017). News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public, 2(4), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317725539
Darabi, A., Arrington, T. L., and Sayilir, E. (2018). Learning from failure: A meta-analysis of the empirical studies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9579-9
Dewaele, J. M., and MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety.
M. Sato, and S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 263-286). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351190558-12
DeWitt, D., Atkinson, M. and Wegner, D. (2018). How conspiracy theories spread. In: Uscinski JE (ed.) Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0021
Douglas, K. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220982068
Douglas, K.M., Uscinski, J.E., and Sutton, R.M. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40(S1): 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., and Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(1), 3-35 .https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Dyrendal, A., and Jolley, D. (2020). Conspiracy theories in the classroom: Problems and potential solutions. Religion, 11(10), 494. https://doi. org/ 10. 3390/ rel11100494
Flemming, K., and Noyes, J. (2021). Qualitative evidence synthesis: Where are we at? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276
Goreis, A., and Voracek, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta‐analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement instruments, and associations with personality traits. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 725-756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Gusenbauer M., and Haddaway NR (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods 11(2): 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Graeupner, D., and Coman, A. (2017). The dark side of meaning-making: How social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003
Kubota, R., Aoyama, R., Kajigaya, T., and Deschambault, R. (2022). Illuminating language users in the discourse of linguistic diversity: Toward justice-informed language education. Educational Linguistics, 1, 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2022-0011
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., and Douglas, K. M. (2017). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.8
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., and Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the "Post-Truth" Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., and Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
Mahl D, Zeng J and Schafer MS (2021) From "nasa lies" to "reptilian eyes": mapping communication about 10 conspiracy theories, their communities, and main propagators on Twitter. Social Media + Society 7(2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482
Mancosu, M. and Vegetti, F. (2020) "Is it the message or the messenger?": conspiracy endorsement and media sources. Social Science Computer Review 39(6): 1203-1217.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320965107
Mercier, H., and Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674977860
Oliver, J. E., and Wood, T. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084
Pearson, C. A., and Rae, A. M. (2017). Beliefs in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizophyte. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 279-284.
Pennycook, G., and Rand, D. G. (2018). The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Stories Increases Perceived Accuracy of Stories Without Warnings. Management Science, 67(11), 4944-4957. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication 35(3): 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066
Sato, M., and Loewen, S. (2022). The research-practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and future. Modern Language Journal, 106, 509-527. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., and Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133(3), 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33(47), 74.
Van Dijck, J., Winkel, T. and de Schafer, M.T. (2021) Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045662
Van Hell, J. G. (2023). The neurocognitive underpinnings of second language processing: Knowledge gains from the past and future outlook. Language Learning, 73(Suppl. 2), 95-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12601
van Prooijen, J. W., and Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Vaportzis, E., Giatsi Clausen, M., and Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults' perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., and Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Ward, J. S., and Barker, A. (2013). Undefined by data: A survey of big data definitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.5821.
Wood, M. J., and Douglas, K. M. (2013). "What about Building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.3999 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409
| Estadísticas de artículo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas de resúmenes | |
| Vistas de PDF | |
| Descargas de PDF | |
| Vistas de HTML | |
| Otras vistas | |
Derechos de autor 2026 Academia y Virtualidad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
