Virtual Team Performance
An Empirical Study On University Research Teams
Resumen
This paper analyses how virtual teams function in academic and research environments, with the aim of identifying the factors that make research collaboration more successful in virtual settings. The study’s methodology is based on an online questionnaire administered to academics from 82 Spanish universities, covering a total of 1,030 faculties and research centers. The data were analysed using partial least squares regression with SmartPLS 4.0. The findings offer valuable insights for leaders and administrators in higher education. According to the results, strong team performance depends less on institutional managers and more on the leadership abilities of the research team leaders themselves. These leaders build trust and cohesion within the group and coordinate tasks effectively. Effective coordination plays a crucial role in strengthening trust and cohesion among team members, which significantly enhances overall team performance. A key contribution of this research is its analysis of virtual research teams across all scientific fields, institutions, and professional categories.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Ahuja, J. (2010). A Study of Virtuality Impact on Team Performance. Journal of Management Research, 9(5), 27-56. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4f2749ccc3d8617fa6b9cf4d9d10424a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54462
Alaiad, A., Alnsour, Y., & Alsharo, M. (2019). Virtual teams: Thematic taxonomy, constructs model, and future research directions. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2929370
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 490, 54, 479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005
Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.
Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2012.01.008
Beranek, P. M., & Martz, B. (2005). Making virtual teams more effective: Improving relational links. Team Performance Management, 11(5–6), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590510617774/FULL/PDF
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., Hibben, F., & Hertel, G. (2020). Trust in teams: A taxonomy of perceived trustworthiness factors and risk-taking behaviors in face-to-face and virtual teams. Human Relations, 73(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718818721
Carmine, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment [Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences]. Sage.
Chamakiotis, P., Panteli, N. &, Davison, R. M. (2021). Reimagining e-leadership for reconfigured virtual teams due to Covid-19. International Journal of Information Management, 60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102381
Chang, H. H., Hung, C. J., & Hsieh, H. W. (2014). Virtual teams: cultural adaptation, communication quality, and interpersonal trust. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25, 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.704274
Charlier, S. D., Stewart, G. L., Greco, L. M., & Reeves, C. J. (2016). Emergent leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel investigation of individual communication and team dispersion antecedents. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2016.05.002
Cheng, X., Fu, S., Sun, J., Han, Y., Shen, J., & Zarifis, A. (2016). Investigating individual trust in semi-virtual collaboration of multicultural and unicultural teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.03.093
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
Correia, M. P., Marques, C. S., Silva, R., & Ramadani, V. (2024). Academic Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01819-x
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/APL0000110
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1558630
Drouin, N., Bourgault, M. & Gervais, C. (2010). Effects of organizational support on components of virtual project teams. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(4), 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011076082
Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. R. (2017). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key. Business Horizons, 60 (1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2016.08.009
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual Teams in Times of Pandemic: Factors That Influence Performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.624637/FULL
Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2006.09.004
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.1040.0028
Lane, J. N., Leonardi, P. M., Contractor, N. S., & DeChurch, L. A. (2024). Teams in the Digital Workplace: Technology’s Role for Communication, Collaboration, and Performance. Small Group Research, 55(1), 139-183. http://doi.org/10.1177/10464964231200015
Lin, C., Standing, C., & Liu, Y. C. (2008). A model to develop effective virtual teams. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSS.2008.04.002
Liu, J., Gong, X., Xu, S., & Huang, C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between team diversity and the innovative performance in research teams using decision tree algorithms: evidence from artificial intelligence. Scientometrics, 129(12), 7805-7831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05183-0
Lu, L. (2015). Building trust and cohesion in virtual teams: the developmental approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-11-2014-0068
Miranda, F. J., & Chamorro-Mera, A. (2024). Virtual Teams in the University: A Critical Literature Review and A Research Agenda. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(1), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.21272/MMI.2024.1-15
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-020-2801-5
MCIU (2023). Estadística de personal de las universidades. https://www.universidades.gob.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NOTA_EPU_22-23.pdf
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pangil, F., & Chan, J. M. (2014). The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2013-0341/FULL/PDF
Paul, R., Drake, J. R., & Liang, H. (2016). Global Virtual Team Performance: The Effect of Coordination Effectiveness, Trust, and Team Cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2583319
Paul, D. L. & McDaniel, R. R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly 28(2), 183-227.
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management, 50(4), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2012.10.002
Powell, A., Piccoli, G. & Ives, B. (2004) Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35, 6-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/968464.968467
Privman, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Wang, Y. (2013). In-Group (Us) versus out-group (Them) dynamics and effectiveness in partially distributed teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2237253
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge-Based Approach. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33 (1), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27751276
Ross, T. M., Jones, E. C., & Adams, S. G. (2008). Can team effectiveness be predicted? Team Performance Management, 14(5–6), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810898518
Rusman, E., Van Bruggen, J., Sloep, P., & Koper, R. (2010). Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a TrustWorthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(11), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2010.07.003
Schulze, J., Schultze, M., West, S. G., & Krumm, S. (2017). The Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other Characteristics Required for Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: Similar or Distinct Constructs? Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-016-9465-6/TABLES/7
SJR (2025). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php
Tan, C. K., Ramayah, T., Teoh, A. P., & Cheah, J. H. (2019). Factors influencing virtual team performance in Malaysia. Kybernetes, 48(9), 2065–2092. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2018-0031/FULL/XML
Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34(2), 170–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331218
Wang, L., Kim, K. (2024). Fostering Knowledge Exchange in Digital Communities: Psychological Determinants of Sharing in Q&A Platforms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01929-6
Young, M., Dubé, T. (2024). What if we consider research teams as teams? Advances in Health Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10375-7
Xiao, Y. C., & Jin, Y. H. (2010). The hierarchical linear modeling of shared mental model on virtual team effectiveness. Kybernetes, 39(8), 1322–1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011063619/FULL/PDF
| Estadísticas de artículo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas de resúmenes | |
| Vistas de PDF | |
| Descargas de PDF | |
| Vistas de HTML | |
| Otras vistas | |
Derechos de autor 2026 Academia y Virtualidad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
